BA attainment as an equity priority
Terrific Forbes column by thinkLaw’s Colin Seale. It is entitled The Equity Problem With Saying ‘College Isn’t For Everyone’. Seale is exactly right to label four-year degree attainment an equity issue.
Are there some with four-year degrees who struggle economically? Of course. Are there some without four-year degrees who are economically well off? Also, of course. That said, the data are clear: there is no path to class and racial equity that does not include much higher bachelor’s degree attainment for those who grow up in non-affluent and/or non-white households.
Seale presents data from the National Center for Education Statistics that shows that 25-34 year old African Americans with bachelor’s degrees earn 65 percent more median earnings than those with a high school degree. For Hispanics the median earnings premium is 49 percent, for women it is 61 percent, and for Asians it is 105 percent.
The median earnings premium for 25-34 year olds is also substantial for those with a bachelor’s degree compared to an associate’s degree. For example, for African Americans median earnings increase by $2,620 for those with an associate’s degree compared to those with a high school degree. For those with a bachelor’s degree compared to those with an associates degree the median wage premium is $15,380.
What about student loans leaving young adults with a bachelor’s degree or more saddled with crushing debt? The Financial Returns from College across Generations: Large but Unequal report from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis answers that question.
The report analyzes the contributors to family net worth based on respondents’ age, race, parents education (those three combined the report calls inherited characteristics) and then by whether the respondent has a four-year degree or not. The report calculates the amount of family net worth one earns by getting a four-year degree after taking out the net worth effects of one’s age, race and parents education. Outstanding student loans are one of the liabilities subtracted from net wealth.
The bottom line finding is that for every combination of age, race and parents education analyzed median family net worth increases for those who get four-year degrees and for those who don’t get a four-year degree it reduces median family net wealth. The gap between getting or not getting a four-year degree, no matter your inherited characteristics, is substantial.
Non-white families under 40 have the lowest net worth of all the cohorts analyzed. Those with a college educated parent have net worth at the 22nd percentile of all families. But for those with a head of household with a four-year degree net worth is at the 29th percentile compared to the 18th percentile for those with a head of household that does not have a four-year degree.
Non-white families under 40 with neither parent having a bachelor’s degree have net worth at the 24th percentile for all families. But for those with a head of household with a four-year degree net worth is at the 31st percentile compared to the 22nd percentile for those with a head of household that does not have a four-year degree.
Seale powerfully sums up this way:
Lastly, it is hard to hear experts claim that college is no longer necessary without asking a clarifying equity question: college is no longer necessary for whom? The over-representation of students representing the 1% of the wealthiest families in the United States at elite institutions suggests that college is still necessary for this overwhelmingly white population. Maybe they value the undeniable boosts to social capital resulting from being part of alumni networks that create lifelong connections that span generations. Perhaps they appreciate the intangible, but priceless benefits a broad liberal arts foundation provides, like equipping students for the 21st century challenge of solving problems across disciplines. Affluent families are allegedly willing to lie, cheat and pay boatloads of cash to get their children into selective colleges, apparently owning the fact that merit is less important than access. It is inequitable to support a “college isn’t for everyone” mentality that treats higher education as an obvious expectation for students from privileged backgrounds and as a luxury good for others.
Simply put, as long as a four-year college degree continues to be a valid predictor of lifetime earnings with a multiplier effect for diverse populations, a key to long-term success in the 21st century workforce, and a reliable pathway for increased social capital, high schools ought to prepare all students to have a legitimate opportunity to successfully complete a four-year degree.”